Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that because of erroneous pretrial Wade rulings, a new trial is required. We disagree. The trial court should not have allowed the complainant Collins to make an in-court identification of the defendant because he had viewed an unduly suggestive photographic array of the defendant and subsequently failed to testify at the "independent basis" hearing (see, People v Ryan,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.