OTT v. BOSTON EDISON CO.


413 Mass. 680 (1992)

602 N.E.2d 566

MERLE D. OTT & another vs. BOSTON EDISON COMPANY.

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk.

November 10, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David S. Godkin (Gordon H. Hayes with him) for the plaintiffs.

John D. Donovan, Jr. (Matthew M. Burke with him) for the defendant.

Stephen S. Ostrach & Emily R. Livingston, for New England Corporate Counsel Association & another, amici curiae, submitted a brief.

Present: LIACOS, C.J., WILKINS, ABRAMS, O'CONNOR, & GREANEY, JJ.


WILKINS, J.

The substantive issue in this appeal is no longer in controversy and is moot because the plaintiff appellants have attained by another process the objective that they sought by the commencement of this action. The circumstances do not justify or require an expression of our views on the substantive issue. The issue is not likely to recur between the parties or people similarly situated and, if it did, a timely...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases