RAKER v. CITY OF CHARLESTON

Civ. A. No. 2:91-0697.

782 F.Supp. 308 (1992)

Thomas R. RAKER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF CHARLESTON, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division.

January 27, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James B. Lees, Jr., Hunt & Wilson, Charleston, W.Va., for plaintiffs.

Thomas M. Hayes, Charleston, W.Va., for defendant City of Charleston.

L. Anthony George, Jackson & Kelly, Charleston, W.Va., for defendant Kent Strange Hall.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending are Defendants' motions for summary judgment and Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. The Court GRANTS the Defendants' motions, DENIES the Plaintiffs' motion, and ORDERS this action dismissed and stricken from the docket of the Court.

I.

Under Rule 56(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment is proper only:

"[I]f the pleadings, depositions, answers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases