CITY OF EUGENE v. KRUK

91-50006; CA A71272.

839 P.2d 250 (1992)

115 Or. App. 494

CITY OF EUGENE, Respondent, v. Kathy Kay KRUK, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 14, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied December 16, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmund J. Spinney, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Jens Schmidt, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Floyd F. Prozanski, Jr. and Harrang Long Watkinson Arnold & Laird, P.C., Eugene.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


WARREN, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals her conviction under Eugene Municipal Code § 4.907 (EC § 4.907) for "Interferring [sic] with a Police Officer." She contends that the trial court erred in overruling her demurrer, because the municipal ordinance is preempted by state law. We agree and reverse.1

One morning in September, 1990, at about 3:00 a.m., defendant and her extended family were awakened by a commotion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases