STATE v. TULL

90C-21213; CA A69389.

839 P.2d 249 (1992)

115 Or. App. 577

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Carol Ann TULL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 14, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jesse Wm. Barton, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Harrison Latto, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Dummitt, 115 Or.App. 487, 839 P.2d 246 (decided this date).

EDMONDS, J., dissenting.

EDMONDS, Judge, dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissent in State v. Dummitt, 115 Or.App. 487, 839 P.2d 246 (decided...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases