1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 839 P.2d
  5. 839 P.2d 238 (1992)
 

YAMHILL v. LCDC

91-RA-792; CA A72899.

839 P.2d 238 (1992)

115 Or. App. 468

YAMHILL COUNTY, Petitioner, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 14, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael R. Campbell, Portland, argued the cause, for petitioner. On the brief were Steven L. Pfeiffer and Stoel Rives Boley Jones & Grey, Portland, and John M. Gray, Jr., Yamhill County Counsel, McMinnville.

Jas. Adams, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on the brief, were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Yamhill County seeks review of LCDC's periodic review order under former ORS 197.640 to former ORS 197.647.1 We affirm.

The county had included as resources on its Goal 5 inventory, as revised for periodic review, the scenic waterway and watershed and potential municipal reservoir in the Walker Flat area. LCDC's order directed the county to add three other resources in the area to its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases