Chief Justice ROVIRA delivered the Opinion of the Court.
This original proceeding pursuant to C.A.R. 21 arises as a direct consequence of our holding that the death penalty statute as amended in 1988, section 16-11-103, 8A C.R.S. (1988 Supp.), was facially unconstitutional because it eliminated the fourth step from jury deliberations during the sentencing phase following conviction for a class 1 felony. See People v. Young,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.