1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 80 N.Y.2d
  5. 80 N.Y.2d 986 (1992)
 

MAURICE GOLDMAN & SONS, INC. v. HANOVER INS. CO.

80 N.Y.2d 986 (1992)

Maurice Goldman & Sons, Inc., Appellant, v. Hanover Insurance Company et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided November 18, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tenzer, Greenblatt, Fallon & Kaplan, New York City (Edward L. Sadowsky of counsel), for appellant.

Abrams & Martin, P. C., New York City (Michael E. Gorelick and Martin I. Nagel of counsel), for respondents.

Acting Chief Judge SIMONS and Judges KAYE, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA and SMITH concur.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

During a business trip, plaintiff's president noticed that a bag containing jewelry was missing from his personal effects. He was unable to say how or where the loss occurred. Plaintiff thereafter submitted a claim to defendants, the issuers of its primary and excess "jewelers block" insurance policies. Defendants, however, disclaimed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases