GOLDMAN v. GOLDMAN

No. 78,517.

883 P.2d 181 (1992)

Monte H. GOLDMAN, individually, and as a general partner for the use and benefit of all entities listed on Exhibit "A", d/b/a Goldman Enterprises; Goldman Investments; Goldman Investment Company; Goldco Operating; Monte H. Goldman as former Trustee of Trust No. 928 and as primary, secondary or contingent beneficiary of the trusts listed on Exhibit "A"; and Monte H. Goldman as father and next friend of Meghan Goldman and Leslie Goldman, minors, Appellees, v. Alfred D. GOLDMAN, individually and as the former managing general partner of the co-partnership with Monte H. Goldman, and as Trustee and Supervisor of certain trusts for the benefit of Monte H. Goldman, Meghan Goldman, and/or Leslie Goldman; Peter Boatright, individually, as officer of the Corporations and Partnerships and Trusts listed in Exhibit "A", and as Trustee and Supervisor of certain trusts for the benefit of Monte H. Goldman, Meghan Goldman and/or Leslie Goldman, Appellants, and Frances Boatright, Supervisor of Trusts for the benefit of Monte H. Goldman; Patrick J. Casey, Trustee and Supervisor of certain Trusts for the benefit of Monte H. Goldman, Meghan Goldman and/or Leslie Goldman; John J. Griffin, Trustee and Supervisor of certain Trusts for the benefit of Monte H. Goldman; A. Robert Heiman, Trustee and Supervisor of certain Trusts for the benefit of Monte H. Goldman, Meghan Goldman and/or Leslie Goldman; Robert Greenberg, Trustee of certain Trusts for the benefit of Monte H. Goldman, Meghan Goldman and/or Leslie Goldman; Clarke Randall, Trustee of certain Trusts for the benefit of Monte H. Goldman, Meghan Goldman and/or Leslie Goldman; Roddy Bates; Chris Bolding; Debi Cherry; Jo Ann Nipper; Susie Scharf and Judy Weeks, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3.

Rehearing Denied January 12, 1993.

Certiorari Dismissed October 11, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. Linn, John D. Singleton, Oklahoma City, for appellants.

B.J. Cooper, Oklahoma City, John Edmunds, Honolulu, HI, Kenneth Upton, Edmond, for appellees.


Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 30.

OPINION

HANSEN, Vice Chief Judge:

Appellants seek review of the trial court's order imposing sanctions for failure to comply with the court's discovery order. The sanctions included, among other things, dismissal of Appellant Alfred Goldman's counterclaims. We reverse and remand.

This action arises from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases