1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 795 F.Supp.
  5. 795 F.Supp. 261 (1992)
 

OTTAWA, ILL. v. SAMMONS COMMUNICATIONS

No. 87 C 1325.

795 F.Supp. 261 (1992)

CITY OF OTTAWA, ILLINOIS, City of Marseilles, Illinois, Village of Naplate, Illinois, City of Streator, Illinois, and Village of Seneca, Illinois, Plaintiffs, v. SAMMONS COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Sammons Communications of Illinois, Inc., and Arthur J. Kraus, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

June 29, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Hayner, Ottawa, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Michael E. Rigney, William Denby Heinz, Jenner & Block, Chicago, Ill., for defendants Sammons Communications, Inc. and Sammons Communications of Illinois, Inc.

Craig M. Armstrong, Armstrong & Surin, Ottawa, Ill., for defendant Arthur J. Kraus.

ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court are the defendants' motions for summary judgment, and the plaintiffs' motion to remand to state court. For reasons that follow, the motions for summary judgment are denied and the motion to remand is denied.

FACTS

The plaintiffs, five Illinois municipalities — the cities of Ottawa, Marseilles and Streator and the villages of Naplate and Seneca (together the "municipalities") —...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases