GINGOLD v. BEEKMAN


183 A.D.2d 870 (1992)

Irving Gingold, Respondent, v. Peter Beekman et al., Defendants, and Bennett Kielson Company et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 26, 1992


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The appellants argue on appeal that the complaint failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for fraud. However, reviewing the complaint as a whole (see, Home Reporter v Brooklyn Spectator, 34 A.D.2d 956), including supporting affidavits (see, Rotanelli v Madden, 172 A.D.2d 815), taking...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases