1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 183 A.D.2d
  5. 183 A.D.2d 859 (1992)
 

PEOPLE v. ROHENA

183 A.D.2d 859 (1992)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Angel Rohena, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 18, 1992

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Although it was improper for Assistant District Attorney Daniel Penofsky to have prosecuted this matter, since he was not admitted to the practice of law, the defendant has failed to demonstrate any resulting prejudice. Absent a showing of prejudice, this regrettable circumstance does not constitute reversible error (see, People v Carter, 77 N.Y.2d 95, cert denied ___ US...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases