1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 806 F.Supp.
  5. 806 F.Supp. 232 (1992)
 

U.S. v. FORBES

Cr. A. No. 92-CR-105.

806 F.Supp. 232 (1992)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Damon S. FORBES, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

November 20, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charlotte Mapes and David M. Gaouette, Asst. U.S. Attys., Denver, Colo., for plaintiff.

Brian K. Holland, Holland, Seelen & Pagliuca, Denver, Colo., for Forbes.

Warren Williamson, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Denver, Colo., for Stone.

Dan Boyle, D.F. Boyle & Associates, Denver, Colo., for Etcheverry.

Michael L. Bender and Stephanie B. Boyer, Bender & Treece, P.C., Denver, Colo., for Halepaska.

Alexander DeSalvo, Denver, Colo., for Slovick.

Richard J. Banta, Denver, Colo., for Spagna.

Robert W. Cook, Boulder, Colo., for Souza.

Peter R. Bornstein, Berenbaum & Weinshienk, P.C., Denver, Colo., for Beal.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BABCOCK, District Judge.

Defendants move to dismiss this action contending that the definition of a controlled substance analogue as applied here is unconstitutionally vague. 21 U.S.C. § 802(32)(A). Hearing on the motion was held on November 19, 1992. Because the definition of "analogue" as applied here provides neither fair warning nor effective safeguards against arbitrary enforcement, it is void for vagueness. Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases