TAYLOR v. VOLVO NORTH AMERICA CORP.

No. 9118SC753.

421 S.E.2d 617 (1992)

Curtis Wilson TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VOLVO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

October 20, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Sam Johnson, Jr., Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellee.

Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore by Bynum M. Hunter and William Sam Byassee, Greensboro, for defendant-appellant.


EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant raises four assignments of error. After careful consideration, we affirm.

I.

First, defendant argues that plaintiff's evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support his recovery. We disagree.

The New Motor Vehicles Warranties Act (the Act), Article 15A of Chapter 20, establishes a private remedy for consumers. G.S. §§ 20-351 to 20-351.10 (1989); see...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases