KATZ v. AETNA CAS. & SUR. CO.

No. 91-1498.

972 F.2d 53 (1992)

Harold KATZ and Ruth Katz, Appellants, v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided August 6, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin P. Smith (argued), Smith, McEldrew & Levenberg, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.

Warren L. Simpson, Jr. (argued), Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Before: SCIRICA, ALITO and SEITZ, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.

In this diversity case, Harold and Ruth Katz allege that the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company intentionally concealed the existence of a liability policy issued by another insurance company, and that this concealment constituted a violation of the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law and common law fraud. The district court granted summary judgment for Aetna. We will affirm in part...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases