KING v. ROCK


415 Pa.Super. 605 (1992)

610 A.2d 48

Darrel KING and Hazel King, his wife, Appellant, v. Dorothy ROCK and Russell Brady, Appellee.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed June 8, 1992.

Reargument Denied August 12, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Simon B. John, Uniontown, for appellant.

Maria S. Altobelli, Uniontown, for appellee.

Before CAVANAUGH, WIEAND and HESTER, JJ.


CAVANAUGH, Judge:

This appeal is from an order finding that appellees, Dorothy Rock and Russell Brady, hold an easement by implication over the entire width and length of an undedicated roadway. Appellant, Hazel King1, argues that the evidence does not establish an easement by implication. King maintains that there was no showing the existence of a boundary road between her property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases