1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 971 F.2d
  5. 971 F.2d 37 (1992)
 

RESERVE SUPPLY v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS

No. 91-1154.

971 F.2d 37 (1992)

RESERVE SUPPLY CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and CertainTeed Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 4, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert N. Sodikoff, Charles E. Zeitlin, Greenberg, Keele, Lunn & Aronberg, and Richard P. Campbell, and Anthony S. Divincenzo (argued), Campbell & Divincenzo, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellant.

Jeffrey L. Dorman, Earl E. Pollock, Blake L. Harrop, Robert T. Joseph, Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, and David F. Graham, Pamela R. Hanebutt and Douglas F. Fuson (argued), Sidley & Austin, Chicago, Ill., for defendants-appellees.

Before WOOD, Jr., RIPPLE, and MANION, Circuit Judges.

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

Reserve Supply Corporation (Reserve) appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (Owens-Corning) and CertainTeed Corporation (CertainTeed). The district court determined that Owens-Corning and CertainTeed did not conspire to fix prices in the residential fiberglass insulation market in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases