ADAMS v. SCHUYLER, ROCHE & ZWIRNER, P.C.

No. 92 C 2857.

803 F.Supp. 202 (1992)

Dagmar C. ADAMS, Plaintiff, v. SCHUYLER, ROCHE & ZWIRNER, P.C., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

August 26, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest Thomas Rossiello, Ernest T. Rossiello & Associates, Ellen Deborah Krengel, Ellen D. Krengel, Chicago, Ill., David Charles Adams, David Charles Adams, Highland Park, Ill., for plaintiff.

Glenn Douglas Newman, John G. Levi, Sidley & Austin, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Defendant Schuyler, Roche & Zwirner, P.C. ("Schuyler") has moved for summary judgment on plaintiff Dagmar C. Adams' Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA") complaint. Schuyler's argument is that Adams failed to file her charge of age discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") within 300 days of Schuyler's alleged unlawful employment practice, as required by 29 U.S...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases