IN RE LAY

No. V89-83997.

63 Ohio Misc.2d 35 (1991)

In re LAY.

Court of Claims of Ohio, Victims of Crime Division.

Decided May 14, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. Lay, pro se.

Lee Fisher, Attorney General, for the state.


SHOEMAKER, Judge.

On December 7, 1989, the applicant, James P. Lay, filed a reparations application, on behalf of his minor daughter, Jamie T. Lay, seeking reparation for a sexual assault on his daughter. The minor daughter was four years old on the date of the assault. The offender was charged on November 2, 1986, with gross sexual imposition.

On May 11, 1990, the single commissioner issued an opinion and order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases