1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 778 F.Supp.
  5. 778 F.Supp. 205 (1991)
 

U.S. v. WILLIS

No. S 89 Cr. 561 (MGC).

778 F.Supp. 205 (1991)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Robert Howard WILLIS, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 2, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Otto G. Obermaier, U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City by Denis J. McInerney, Asst. U.S. Atty., for U.S.

Spengler Carlson Gubar Brodsky & Frischling, New York City by Edward Brodsky, Lawrence S. Hirsh, for defendant.

OPINION

CEDARBAUM, District Judge.

For the third time, defendant has moved to dismiss the indictment in this case.1 Familiarity is assumed with my previous opinion denying defendant's earlier motions. That opinion is reported at 737 F.Supp. 269 (1990). I shall not repeat my extensive discussion of the charges set out in the indictment or of the misappropriation theory of liability under Section...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases