1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 822 P.2d
  5. 822 P.2d 159 (1991)
 

STATE v. SCHMITT

C 89 08 34126; CA A64957.

822 P.2d 159 (1991)

110 Or.App. 374

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Frederick Charles SCHMITT, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 26, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack D. Howe, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Harrison Latto, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and DEITS, J.

JOSEPH, Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction, after a trial to the court on stipulated facts, of possession and delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1), (4). He assigns error to the court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence found in his home. We affirm.

The court either made, or could have made, the findings that we recite, which are consistent with its conclusion. See Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or. 485, 487, 443...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases