1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 806 P.2d
  5. 806 P.2d 172 (1991)
 

ACCIDENT PREVENTION DIV. v. ROSEBURG

SH-89107; CA A62768.

806 P.2d 172 (1991)

106 Or. App. 69

ACCIDENT PREVENTION DIVISION, Respondent, v. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 20, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kimberly D. Wallan, Medford, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Cowling & Heysell, Medford.

Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.

DE MUNIZ, Judge.

Employer seeks review of an order under the Oregon Safe Employment Act, ORS 654.001 to ORS 654.295; ORS 654.991, that affirmed a citation issued to it for violation of OAR 437-40-030(1). We affirm.

The citation arose from the on the job death of Purcell at employer's complex in Dillard. In January, 1989, labor unions struck employer. Supervisory personnel, including Purcell, were assigned to fill in for striking workers. Purcell and two other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases