JOY v. KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEM. CORP.

No. 11125-3-III.

62 Wn. App. 909 (1991)

816 P.2d 90

JIMMIE JOY, ET AL, Appellants, v. KAISER ALUMINUM AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

As amended by order October 31, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley E. Perdue and Perdue Law Firm, for appellants.

Leo J. Driscoll and Winston & Cashatt, for respondent.


[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals October 31, 1991.]

SHIELDS, J.

Jimmie Joy sued his employer, Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation, for tortious interference with his off-duty contractual right to do work for others. Kaiser moved to dismiss, asserting lack of subject matter jurisdiction because of preemption by section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). Mr. Joy appeals the dismissal of his claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases