Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of burglary in the second degree and petit larceny because it consisted of uncorroborated accomplice testimony (see, CPL 60.22 [1]) is without merit. Although the People's case was based largely upon accomplice testimony, that testimony was sufficiently corroborated by independent evidence tending to connect the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
