BRUCE v. MARTIN

No. 90 Civ. 1002 (RWS).

766 F.Supp. 200 (1991)

Norman M. BRUCE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Thomas A. MARTIN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 19, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Beigel & Sandler, Ltd., New York City (Marilyn Neiman, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Spengler Carlson Gubar Brodsky & Frischling, New York City (Robert S. Carlson, of counsel), for defendants.


OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant Thomas A. Martin and various defendants aligned in interest with him ("the Kinderhill Defendants") have moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) for judgment on the pleadings in this and two related cases, Bruce v. Martin, 87 Civ. 7737 (RWS) ("Bruce I")1 and Malone v. Martin, 90 Civ. 4651 (RWS), and for an injunction preventing plaintiffs' counsel from several related...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases