LAW ENF. LABOR SERV. v. COUNTY OF MOWER

No. C9-90-2329.

469 N.W.2d 496 (1991)

LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC., et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY OF MOWER, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted July 24, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregg M. Corwin, Linda M. Nelson and Karin Peterson, Gregg M. Corwin & Associates, St. Louis Park, for appellants.

Richard A. Beens and Scott M. Lepak, Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Anoka, for respondents.

Considered and decided by FORSBERG, P.J., and CRIPPEN and MULALLY, JJ.


OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

In its collective bargaining agreement with essential employees, represented by appellant Law Enforcement Labor Services (LELS), respondent Mower County promised retiree health insurance benefits. LELS contends the trial court erred in its determination that respondent may unilaterally change these contract terms once impasse on the subject is reached during contract negotiations.

Respondents, the county and its commissioners...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases