HILL v. HUMAN RIGHTS COM'N

No. 89 C 3012.

762 F.Supp. 196 (1991)

Constance HILL, Plaintiff, v. HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

March 6, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Constance Hill, pro se.

Mary Ellen Coghlan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Office of the Atty. Gen., Chicago, Ill., for defendants.


ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is the summary judgment of defendants Human Rights Commission, Kent Sezer, and David Strauss. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted.

FACTS

On April 19, 1989, plaintiff Constance Hill ("Hill") filed this employment discrimination action, together with a petition to proceed in forma pauperis and a motion for appointment of counsel. In her complaint, Hill alleges that she had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases