Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his guilt was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt in view of inconsistencies in the testimony of the People's two main witnesses and the conflict between their version and the defendant's version of the occurrences at bar. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.