1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 776 F.Supp.
  5. 776 F.Supp. 168 (1991)
 

SHARMA v. DURACELL, INC.

No. 91 Civ. 3013 (RO).

776 F.Supp. 168 (1991)

Gautam SHARMA, Plaintiff, v. DURACELL, INC. and Bodian & Eames, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

October 30, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gautam Sharma, pro se.

Bodian & Eames, New York City (David T. Eames, Susan Brom, of counsel), for defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

OWEN, District Judge:

This case began with an illegal scheme in which a company called Engineered Assemblies Corp. purchased from Duracell unpackaged batteries in bulk at substantially discounted prices on condition that these batteries not be resold. Plaintiff Gautam Sharma, with others, arranged to divert the batteries to two Singapore companies which packaged them in counterfeit Duracell packaging and then sold them illegally at retail...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases