HOROSHAK v. STATE

No. C2-90-2477.

469 N.W.2d 474 (1991)

Andrew Philip HOROSHAK, Petitioner, Appellant, v. STATE of Minnesota, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied July 1, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Lawrence Hammerling, Deputy State Public Defender, Richard G. Carlson, Sp. Asst. State Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Alan L. Mitchell, St. Louis Co. Atty., Duluth, for respondent.

Considered and decided by LANSING, P.J., and PETERSON and SCHULTZ, JJ.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

In a constitutional challenge to Minn. Stat. § 244.09, subd. 11a, Andrew Horoshak contends that limiting retroactive relief petitions to sentences reduced by legislative changes in the durational cells of the guidelines grid denies equal protection to individuals serving sentences reduced by other legislative modifications in the guidelines matrix. Because the distinction in subdivision 11a serves a legitimate state purpose,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases