Granted. The judgment of the court of appeal is reversed. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying defendant's motion for continuance of the March 1, 1989 trial on the basis that defendant was not prejudiced by plaintiff's February 13 supplemental answers to discovery interrogatories which named Robert Reichert as an expert witness, when defendant was aware that Reichert was plaintiff's expert...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
