BARROW, Judge.
This criminal appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the defendant's conviction of distributing an imitation controlled substance. We conclude that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. In doing so, we hold that an imitation controlled substance, as defined by Code § 18.2-247(B), must be one which has a disposition or tendency to be misused.
On September 29, 1988, the defendant sold a small vial...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
