Supreme Court determined that plaintiff failed to demonstrate that her failure to timely serve a complaint was excusable. Her counsel admitted that defendant withdrew all extensions to serve by correspondence dated October 31, 1989 and demanded service by November 20, 1989. No complaint was served and defendant waited to move to dismiss after the expiration of an additional five months from the time of his demand. As the court noted, the failure to serve was wholly unexplained...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.