Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that he is entitled to a de novo suppression hearing because of the People's delay in providing certain Rosario materials which he claims were crucial to effective cross-examination of Officer Finamore at the Huntley hearing. We disagree.
This is not a case where the People completely failed to deliver Rosario materials to defense counsel, in which circumstance the courts will...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.