MILLER v. MILLER

L88-0366; CA A60808.

808 P.2d 105 (1991)

106 Or. App. 434

Emmy MILLER, Appellant, v. Dale E. MILLER, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 3, 1991.

Reconsideration Denied May 29, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dean Heiling, Salem, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Joel DeVore, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Louis L. Kurtz and Luvaas, Cobb, Richards & Fraser, P.C., Eugene.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Judge.

In this negligence action involving an intersection collision, plaintiff appeals a judgment entered after a jury verdict for defendant. We affirm.

While driving south, plaintiff saw a pedestrian standing on the sidewalk at the southeast corner of an intersection. Plaintiff stopped in the intersection and motioned to the pedestrian to cross the marked, but unsignalled, crosswalk. When the pedestrian was at or near the west curb, defendant drove...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases