1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 765 F.Supp.
  5. 765 F.Supp. 144 (1991)
 

CARUSO v. PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & CO.

No. 86 Civ. 3408 (RPP).

765 F.Supp. 144 (1991)

Conrad S. CARUSO, Plaintiff, v. PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & CO., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 7, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vladeck, Waldman, Elias & Engelhard, New York City by Joseph J. Garcia, for plaintiff.

Cahill Gordon & Reindel, New York City by Thomas J. Kavaler, for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.

This is an action alleging age discrimination and retaliatory discharge in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Defendant moves pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's age discrimination claim in Count 1 of the amended complaint. For the reasons set forth below...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases