GOZLON-PERETZ v. UNITED STATES

No. 89-7370.

498 U.S. 395 (1991)

GOZLON-PERETZ v. UNITED STATES

Supreme Court of the United States.

Decided February 19, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Goldberger, by appointment of the Court, post, p. 805, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Pamela A. Wilk.

Amy L. Wax argued the cause pro hac vice for the United States. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Starr, Acting Assistant Attorney General Mueller, Deputy Solicitor General Bryson, and Richard A. Friedman.


JUSTICE KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case presents a problem in the interpretation of the federal drug enforcement laws and their reference to the method of postconfinement monitoring known as "supervised release." Before 1984, drug offenders sentenced to prison were required to serve terms of special parole following their incarceration. The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 eliminated special parole and, in its place, established conditions for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases