CITY OF VIRGINIA v. NORTHLAND OFF. PROP.

No. C3-90-1581.

465 N.W.2d 424 (1991)

CITY OF VIRGINIA, Respondent, v. NORTHLAND OFFICE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied April 18, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. Thomson, Holmes & Graven, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Frederick A. Dudderar, Jr., Hanft, Fride, O'Brien, Harries, Swelbar & Burns, Duluth, for appellants.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., and SCHUMACHER and DAVIES, JJ.


OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Respondent commenced this action to enforce a development agreement between it and appellants. Both parties moved for summary judgment and the trial court granted summary judgment for respondent.

FACTS

This case concerns the interpretation of section 10 of an agreement titled "Land Disposition Agreement and Contract Guaranteeing Development" (development agreement). Section 10 of the agreement provides:

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases