1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 474 N.W.2d
  5. 474 N.W.2d 413 (1991)
 

ST. PAUL v. DRUG PARAPHERNALIA

No. C9-90-2735.

474 N.W.2d 413 (1991)

CITY OF ST. PAUL, Respondent, v. VARIOUS ITEMS OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA, Defendant, Kawaljit Bhatia, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 27, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Louise T. Dobbe, Robert Stanich, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Jane McPeak, St. Paul City Atty. and James Tures, Asst. City Atty., St. Paul, for respondent.

Randall D.B. Tigue, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, P.J., and LANSING and DAVIES, JJ.

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

The trial court held that the drug paraphernalia statutes were constitutional as applied, there was sufficient evidence to support determinations that various items were drug paraphernalia, and allowing a police officer to testify as an expert was not error. Appellant challenges these determinations. Holding that a finding of intent as to use must be read into the definition of drug paraphernalia...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases