Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant did not sustain his burden of showing that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the premises in which weapons were seized so as to be entitled to claim protection under the exclusionary rule (see, People v Rodriguez,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.