1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 774 F.Supp.
  5. 774 F.Supp. 98 (1991)
 

HENLEY v. SLONE

Civ. No. N-89-458 (TFGD).

774 F.Supp. 98 (1991)

Julian HENLEY, Plaintiff, v. William SLONE and Advest, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut, Bridgeport Division.

October 2, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eliot B. Gersten, Andrea A. Hewitt, Hartford, Conn., for Julian Henley.

Michael J. Dodson, Greene, Turk & Lahm, Wethersfield, Conn., for William Slone.

Dean M. Cordiano, Joseph L. Hammer, Day, Berry & Howard, Hartford, Conn., for Advest, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

DALY, District Judge.

At the Court's request, the parties in the above-captioned matter appeared before it on September 23, 1991 to argue whether recent United States Supreme Court and Second Circuit case law with respect to the appropriate statute of limitations for actions brought under § 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 barred this securities fraud case from proceeding to trial.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases