Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant argues that the People failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the elements of robbery in the first degree set forth in count one of the indictment, to wit, that he "displayed a pistol, revolver and other firearm" (emphasis added). Although he concedes that Penal Law § 160.15 (4) requires possession of only one of the above weapons, he maintains that the People were bound by language of the indictment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
