MARDIROS v. GHALY


175 A.D.2d 680 (1991)

Karouzin Mardiros, Respondent, v. Nabil Ghaly et al., Appellants. (Appeal No. 1.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

July 12, 1991


Order unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in finding that plaintiff's responses to designated items in defendants' demand for a bill of particulars were sufficient. The court's order denying defendants' motion for reargument is not appealable (see, Fahey v County of Nassau, 111 A.D.2d 214

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases