YELLOT v. PORITZKY


170 A.D.2d 676 (1991)

Charles D. Yellot, Appellant, v. Hewman Poritzky et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 25, 1991


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Supreme Court's holding that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to make out a prima facie case of fraud, self-dealing and conspiracy against the defendant-broker and his partner, the codefendant Michael Palmietto. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the plaintiff (see, Cruz v New York City Tr. Auth.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases