RUBERTO v. KANDEL


174 A.D.2d 660 (1991)

Annible Ruberto, Respondent, v. Stuart N. Kandel et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 17, 1991


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

In order to have his case restored to the trial calendar pursuant to CPLR 3404, the plaintiff was required to show a reasonable excuse for the delay in prosecution, a lack of prejudice to the defendants, and merit to his case (see, Stern v Astino, 161 A.D.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases