HOUGH TRANSIT v. NAT. FARMERS ORGANIZATION

No. C1-90-2700.

472 N.W.2d 358 (1991)

HOUGH TRANSIT, LTD., et al., Appellants, v. NATIONAL FARMERS ORGANIZATION, Respondent, Mark Wilke, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 25, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul A. Sortland, Messerli & Kramer, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Stephen F. Rufer, Hefte, Pemberton, Sorlie & Rufer, Fergus Falls, for respondent.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., and SHORT and DAVIES, JJ.


OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, Hough Transit, Ltd. argues the trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding (1) the exclusive dealing agreement between National Farmers Organization and Wilke did not violate state anti-trust law and (2) its claim for tortious interference with a prospective business advantage was meritless. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

Hough Transit, Ltd. is a trucking service which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases