PER CURIAM.
We reverse the summary judgment determining that plaintiff was afforded no coverage under the insurance policy issued by appellee for losses resulting from an accident involving plaintiff's motor home.
There are fact questions as to whether the vehicle was used for "recreational purposes" and not for "everyday use," as provided in the policy definition of the covered vehicle, and as to whether the vehicle was used as "a permanent and primary residence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
