1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 230 Cal.App.3d
  5. 230 Cal.App.3d 595 (1991)
 

IN RE RUZICKA

Docket No. F014251.

230 Cal.App.3d 595 (1991)

285 Cal. Rptr. 435

In re JAMES RANDALL RUZICKA on Habeas Corpus.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

May 23, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

John K. Van de Kamp and Daniel E. Lungren, Attorneys General, Richard B. Iglehart, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Morris Lenk and Paul D. Gifford, Deputy Attorneys General, for Appellant.

Paul Delano Wolf, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, and Jeffrey S. Kross for Respondent.

OPINION

THAXTER, J.

We hold that respondent James Randall Ruzicka was denied due process when he was not given a copy of the written record of the Board of Prison Terms' (hereafter BPT) decision to retain him on parole. To that extent we follow In re Nesper (1990) 217 Cal.App.3d 872 [266 Cal.Rptr. 113]. We disagree with Nesper's conclusion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases