Defendant's challenge to the court's instructions on the elements of robbery in the first degree and the court's response to a jury note which sought clarification of whether defendant must have intended to physically injure as well as forcibly steal is unpreserved for review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Thomas,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.