Defendant was arrested when police officers, performing random computer checks on automobiles, observed defendant, during the early morning hours of November 13, 1988, driving a 1975 Datsun that had been reported stolen the day before.
Defendant's claim on appeal that rebuttal testimony permitted by the Trial Judge was improper as based upon a collateral matter is without merit, as the issue of how defendant came into possession of the automobile in question is material...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
